Aonuma on decision to remake Wind Waker, going back to buttons on 3DS, Mario 3D Land inspiration, Zelda Wii U, difficulty with multiplayer
Posted on July 3, 2013 by Brian(@NE_Brian) in 3DS, GameCube, General Nintendo, News, Wii U
Wired’s interview with Zelda producer Eiji Aonuma is up now for viewing, and it contains a lot of interesting nuggets about Nintendo’s classic series.
Aonuma commented on all three current Zelda projects: Wind Waker HD, A Link Between Worlds, and Zelda Wii U. Topics include the decision to remake Wind Waker (there was pushback internally!), the change to full button control on the 3DS with A Link Between Worlds and how Aonuma gained inspiration from Super Mario 3D Land, the difficulty in implementing multiplayer, and more.
Head past the break for Aonuma’s full remarks.
On the recent news about Aonuma’s interest in working on things other than Zelda…
I would like to, I just don’t have the opportunity (laughs). I’m working on games for both the 3DS and the Wii U, and I don’t know that there are any other franchises or any other people at Nintendo that are [doing the same], so I don’t have a whole lot of bandwidth.
On whether people on Aonuma’s position typically focus on one game rather than a couple…
Oh no, Mr. Miyamoto has many more than I do (laughs). Mr. Miyamoto looks at all of the projects that we’re all handling at any given time, and tries to distribute evenly. We also need to support him as well because it’s unimaginable to think that one person is handling so much at a given time. I’m working on two or three projects at the moment but there’s an advantage to that because each of those projects can inform each other. I can learn things from each of those projects. So there are also benefits to it as well.
On why Nintendo decided to bring back Wind Waker and do an HD version…
When we looked at creating a Zelda for Wii U, there were so many possibilities given the HD graphics. But rather than starting from zero, we actually ran a few tests. We tried converting other console games to Wii U. We actually did this with Twilight Princess and Skyward Sword. And the result of that was, hmm, those are semi-realistic representations of the Zelda world so we weren’t really surprised with what we got. But with Wind Waker, when we converted that to HD we were really surprised at how great it looked.
We actually started thinking, maybe it was too soon to create that graphic style with the GameCube because of the limitations of the hardware. And we’re finding that we’re able to do what we wanted to do: The vision that we had then was being created thanks to the system specs and the HD graphics. It feels like we’re really able to create the complete Wind Waker experience on Wii U. In addition to the graphics, we’ve also got the GamePad and there’s lots of other pluses that we’re finding in converting to the Wii U system.
When I suggested moving forward with Wind Waker HD, internally there was actually a lot of pushback. The reason for that is, people were saying, “Oh, that Link. People didn’t like that Link.” But in talking to our counterparts in the U.S., that wasn’t actually the case, people didn’t have that negative reaction maybe anymore to that younger Link.
Aonuma on how Wind Waker’s visual style has been viewed more favorably, whereas it wasn’t originally…
It could be that when we introduced Wind Waker in that graphic style, people resisted it because it was so new, but over time, we may have created this environment that 10 years later is ready to embrace that graphic style.
On Wind Waker’s cut dungeons/elements…
I know that there have been articles that say we actually had to cut dungeons or remove certain elements, and it is true that I did have to remove certain elements because of scheduling and demands of time. If it was up to me, we’d have added more content: Make the sea even bigger, add islands and puzzles and all these other things, but there’s always the schedule that you need to look out for. If there were sections of the game where you felt that there was supposed to be a dungeon there, or the experience was not what it was meant to be originally it’s probably because we weren’t able to flesh out the architecture; the architecture was not tuned enough. You had traveled this long distance, invested this time, you got somewhere and the experience was very shallow. The reason for that is that tuning was not complete, it’s not that there was a missing dungeon or something was removed. What we’re doing with this version of Wind Waker is, we’re making those adjustments so that the payoff is there. The payoff seems to match your investment.
On whether Wind Waker is Aonuma’s favorite Zelda…
I wouldn’t say that it’s my favorite because it makes it sound like I don’t like the other ones! (laughs) Each one is special to me. I would say that Wind Waker is particularly special because I worked on that just as my son was being born. So it’s the first game I created as a father. For example, the King of Red Lions, I created that, and he has a very paternal, very fatherly-sounding voice, so that I think comes across a little bit. So it was a new life milestone, the timing of that particular project, so it’s certainly special to me and I’ll always remember that. As I’m working on the game again, some of those feelings are coming back. So there’s a special kind of love for that game. But all of the titles remind me of different points in my life, so they’re all very special to me.
On the change from stylus control for DS Zeldas to full button control for A Link Between Worlds on 3DS…
When I made the first DS Zelda game, I had to take advantage of the touch screen. And using the stylus created a lot of opportunities for introducing new surprises and a lot of new fun. So it’s actually kind of interesting because I ended up making two games for that platform, which is actually kind of special. With 3DS, we’ve now got the 3-D, which we did that with Ocarina of Time but I wanted to incorporate that as a function, the 3-D aspects, the 3-D capability. I wanted to make that actually function as a part of the game. Link to the Past is a 2-D world and I wanted to make players experience that shift between 2-D and 3-D. But it’s hard to play with a stylus when you have 3-D on the top screen. Those two things just didn’t match up. So I went back to the button controls. I did move, though, from D-pad controls to the stick, which means a shift from digital to analog. Another thing is, Link to the Past was only up, down, left, right and diagonal. Now you can move in any direction. So we’re tightening up, we’re tuning those controls as well and it’s actually creating new experiences and a new way to interact with Link.
On whether the reception to Super Mario 3D Land’s Zelda level made Aonuma more confident in what he was doing…
That was all Mr. Miyamoto (laughs). Those are Miyamoto’s ideas; he came up with the top-down 3-D in Super Mario 3D Land, and he actually gave me a mission: To work on a 3-D Link to the Past. But I didn’t want to make a remake. I wanted to make a new title but I wasn’t exactly sure how I could incorporate this world into my new project. One of my designers was working on this concept of having Link go into the walls, and being able to access places that he couldn’t get past. If you think about this idea of top down, walking around on the ground and all of a sudden merging with the wall and then the camera angle kind of shifts into this 3-D perspective — if you think about it, maybe Mario Kart is doing something kind of similar to that — but the 3-D representation really matches when you think about shifting between those two perspectives. So that’s when it kind of clicked. And when I looked at how Super Mario 3D Land was also doing the same thing, and the positive reaction it was getting from the users, it did, it reinforced what I was doing and it told me I was on the right track.
On how the world of A Link to the Past may be familiar, but being able to move along objects with the new drawing mechanic tricks those who have played the original…
I do that same thing over and over, almost every day as I’m playing the game. I’ll get stuck in the game and say, hey, this level isn’t complete, is it? And my team has to say, “Remember, this is the new game,” to remind me that I’m not playing Link to the Past anymore, there’s actually this other dimension that I need to move into. I want to give users that same feeling of frustration, that frustrating feeling of getting stuck, because I think that’s a great part of the gaming experience. We’ll continue to work on those, find new ways to do that, and we’ll continue tuning the game to make sure that it’s a good experience for everyone.
On using the features of Wii U in a Zelda made for the ground up for the platform…
That’s actually a really hard question to answer, because if I put it into words it might be misunderstood at this point. Wind Waker is kind of a test pattern for the team. In converting Wind Waker, there’s a lot to be learned. We can’t change too much, because in changing one thing you can break something else, which is not something we want to do. But it’s a shared team working on both of those projects, Wind Waker HD and the new Zelda for Wii U. Every day, they’re learning something new. As we develop the controls for Wind Waker, they’re learning how to apply those controls in the Wii U version. There’s a feedback process where when something’s discovered in development for Wind Waker, all that information is fed to the Wii U team. So we’re working on those things, polishing as we go, and all of those things — it’s a learning process, it’s a test case almost, and we’ll apply all of those learnings that we’ve acquired in developing the Wii U game.
On off-TV play vs. making a full dual screen experience for Wii U…
The gaming community is — I don’t want to sound rude, or anything — very fickle. You’ve got one group that really likes the possibilities that using two screens affords, and then there’s the other half of the group that just likes the simplicity of one screen, they don’t want to bother with two screens. I’m the same way, I’m very fickle. I totally understand where they’re coming from. As a developer, I need to listen to these things and I need to, maybe, make it possible to do either one, do whatever your preference is. I certainly have my preference, but I shouldn’t limit everyone to my preferences. I need to provide an experience that is flexible, allows for maybe both of those options.
What my son does is, he’ll actually turn off the TV and hide in a corner and play. So as a parent who wants to make sure that my child is studying and learning, I don’t know that that’s necessarily the best option! (laughs)
Everyone’s needs are different, so it’s really important to provide the possibility for them to do whatever it is they need to do.
On the difficulty of implementing multiplayer…
Actually, multi-play has been a high hurdle for me, something that’s plagued me for a long time. We did come out with Four Swords but I don’t think that offered a whole lot of surprises for the user. I still believe there’s one Link; the one-Link philosophy works for Zelda. But there are other ways to incorporate kind of a multiplayer experience. One of those ways is the Tingle bottle that we announced. It uses Miiverse. In Wind Waker there’s this vast kind of sea world that you’re traveling in, and there are lots of Links exploring this space. Through the Tingle bottle, that’s where that communication happens with those other Links. They may not physically appear in that space, but you know of their presence through the messages that they leave. They share their experiences, things that they’ve discovered through their explorations, and so again you can feel their presence without their physically being there. That’s a kind of multiplayer, if you think about it. With the new Wii U Zelda, we’re coming up with new ideas that still allow the one-Link idea but are the same type of multiplayer.
On what Zelda means to Nintendo…
You said that Nintendo releases Zelda games regularly. We do release them regularly, but we don’t release them that often. Mario games, if you push to get it done, you can finish it in a year. Zelda games take at least three years to complete. At the same time, I’m getting pushed to release them quicker but the users are expecting bigger experiences. And those things don’t match up. So I struggle with that all the time. I have no idea what I’m supposed to do to meet both of those demands.
With the Mario series, there are two producers, Mr. Tezuka and Mr. Koizumi. With Zelda, it’s just me.
